Login
Ratjoy.com » Forums » EoS General Discussion » How is 7-day EPS calculated?

How is 7-day EPS calculated?


Chad the Launderer
RJ: Synreal
CO: Synreal

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 148
Karma: 71
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
Just wondering.
Matthew Suozzo
RJ: Buckaroo Bonzai

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 40
Karma: 51
Joined: Apr 5, 2012
Just a guess but based on the name (earnings per share) I'll say profit after taxes for the previous 7-day period divided by the number of shares issued.

Okay, it wasn't a guess. http://www.accountingformanagement.com/earnings_per_share_ratio.htm
David Archer
RJ: BallC
CO: BallC

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 142
Karma: 135
Joined: Apr 11, 2012
I think there might be a bug here because take JOI for example:

http://www.ratjoy.com/eos/stock-view.php?ss=JOI

7-Day EPS: $0.03

There are 599M shares outstanding so I expect to see maybe $18M in earnings when I look at the balance sheet. What I actually see is:

Net Earnings $325 M $1.49 G $1.13 G $436 M $4.69 G $720 M $-2.81 G


Maybe Ratan can enlighten us on this?
Matthew Suozzo
RJ: Buckaroo Bonzai

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 40
Karma: 51
Joined: Apr 5, 2012
Mr. Archer is correct. I too am now confused as to how EPS is calculated. I'd love to be enlightened.
Scott (Admin)
RJ: Ratan Joyce
CO: Ratan Joyce

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 1175
Karma: 5083
Joined: Jan 13, 2012
Oh, it's simple.

(networth now - networth 7 days ago) / shares

Let me know if this isn't correct.
Aaron Barr
RJ: Aaron
CO: Aaron

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 81
Karma: 74
Joined: Apr 13, 2012
The above is correct, it is actually: Net Income / Shares. However the way expenses for real companies are calculated is somewhat different than the simplistic methods here. Things like land purchases and equipment purchases for instance are not expensed all at once, but rather over a generally lengthy period of time during which the asset is "used" to produce income. This is why in game you see many growing companies with negative Net Income, then if there is one day with no large factory expansions or raw material purchases their income skyrockets. Depreciation and other accounting principles allocate these expenses more realistically so that real stocks show earnings per share values that make logical sense over long periods of time.

p.s. don't get an accounting degree, its horrendously boring.
Chad the Launderer
RJ: Synreal
CO: Synreal

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 148
Karma: 71
Joined: Feb 11, 2012
Ratan, I think the system you have punishes people expanding as fast as possible. I have spent billions on research, factories and stores and that counts against my revenue and NW. I would have a much higher EPS (and share price) if I just sat on my hands and did nothing. My stores would make their 3 billion a day and my EPS would skyrocket. Instead, I pay dividends and constantly expand and my companies appears to be crap on paper.
Aaron Barr
RJ: Aaron
CO: Aaron

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 81
Karma: 74
Joined: Apr 13, 2012
Right, the problem is you need an accurate EPS system in order to calculate (really have buyers of stock calculate their) P/E ratio. (stock)Price / EPS. The current stock market system has no basis in reality, and that is why there are all these problems. Stock price has no formula. You cannot tie price to networth, earnings, whatever. Stock is the same as any B2B commodity, it is worth what someone will pay, no more. And in addition to the fact that stock price is for some reason formula generated, there are very poor reports available to screen potential stock purchases. EPS is nonsense, and thus P/E is nonsense. Its ripe for scam artists... well that already happened...

Scott (Admin)
RJ: Ratan Joyce
CO: Ratan Joyce

Post Rating: 0
+ / -

Total Posts: 1175
Karma: 5083
Joined: Jan 13, 2012
I admit I'm not smart enough to make sense of them all, so I'll just leave them as nonsense and call it a closed issue.


You need to register or login to post a reply.